BNP Accountability Failure

The hysteria this week has surrounded the BNP. First, there was the issue of whether Nick Griffin should even be allowed on Question Time. Well, of course he should. If his party's values (regardless of how abhorrent most of us find them) appeal to enough members of the British public to get them seats in the European Parliament, then they have earned their right to be on political talk shows. That's called democracy. One of the main reasons that Hitler was able to gain so much support from his entire nation is because Germany felt so severely repressed by the Treaty of Versailles that they would support anyone who was able to take them out of their economic and social depression, even if that person turned out to be the most evil man that's ever lived. To repress Mr Griffin by refusing him a QT seat would only have given him a louder voice to the tone of 'I stick up for the ignored Brits'.
However, after the sensible decision had been taken by the BBC to allow him on Thursday's show, it seemed there was a backup plan to appease all those who thought that public service broadcasting had begun to condone fascism. The plan was to subject Griffin to a partisan verbal massacre. Almost every question was about the BNP, the audience was as politically one-sided as it is possible to achieve, and even David Dimbleby seemed to forego his due impartiality commitment by having deleterious quotes at his beck and call. Eloquence was simply replaced by a mob mentality.
Now let's state for the record that I hate the BNP; I am in fact very left wing. I particularly loathe the BNP's use of World War II iconography and its suggestion that Winston Churchill would have joined their party; that statement doesn't take into account the old, blindingly obvious concept: times change. Churchill fitted into the Conservative Party of the 1940s and was able to fight fascism accordingly; there is no doubt in my mind that if he were alive today he would have the intelligence and the integrity to adapt his political viewpoints to modern times and changing moralities so that he could fit into the Conservative Party today and fight fascists like the BNP today. And it's that kind of considered retort which should be thrown at Nick Griffin, not just shouting and whooping from the crowd while spin doctor politicians from other parties do all they can to coerce the mob into granting them the dubious moral high ground. Griffin needs to be held to account by intellectual debate, not bully-boy humiliation which will only add more fuel to their apparently persecuted fire. Appearing on Question Time should have shown any disillusioned British voters that the BNP was not a suitable electoral alternative by calmly scrutinising and assessing that party's beliefs; an objective which should have been easily achieved considering how corrupt those beliefs are! Unfortunately, I believe that objective failed.

Beards, anyone?

I have recently tried to grow a beard. My god, the hysteria. As I work in an office, numerous people have been chastising me for looking unprofessional or messy. Even though I have blonde hair and it takes me slightly longer to go from the stubble stage to the beard stage than it would for most people, I still found it difficult to comprehend why my work colleagues had such an issue with it. Since when was facial hair a social sign of negativity. Apparently, with the air of vagrancy that I was demonstrating, I may as well have taken off my tie and wrapped it around my forehead! To the people in the world who care so much about public appearance rather than the individual personality underneath, I simply say, "Pay more attention to your own lives and stop concerning yourself with mine, I truly have better things to be thinking about."

Cancer Equals Hysteria

Cancer! Say the word and it immediately conjures up a hysterical reaction in most people. This isn't necessarily all their fault, a major catalyst is the media. A report was released today from the World Cancer Research Fund outlining how lifestyle factors can help to prevent cancer, thereby suggesting that people are currently significantly contributing to their own demise. The main recommendations of the report are that certain types of food should be avoided such as alcohol, sugary drinks, red meat, bacon and ham; everyone should be exercising each day; weight should not be gained through adulthood; and even people with a Body Mass Index of just under 25 should try to lose some more weight. Forgive me, but does this perfect person actually exist?! If they do, I'd like to meet them and shake them by the hand. We lead hectic, pressured lives nowadays in a world which is riddled with imperfections; how are people meant to adhere to these stringent lifestyle regulations when they are perpetually accompanied by long working hours, family commitments, money worries, and (heavens forbid) the opportunity of a social life? And the media does not help! Today's news reports have almost entirely focused on negativity; cancer has been portrayed solely as a "matter of risk" for people to deal with themselves. It is not mentioned that two-thirds of cancers are NOT preventable, you can get them regardless of what you eat, just like you can sometimes get lung cancer without ever having smoked a cigarette; these non-preventable cancers amount to a whopping seven million cases per year which the reports have not taken into account. It's no wonder that people get hysterical with worry when they are near enough blamed for getting cancer themselves even though this is often not the case; and let's not forget that stress will make any condition worse given the opportunity, the media certainly don't help with that. So I leave you with a quote from cancer specialist Karol Sikora which I wholeheartedly concur with: "The main message I would have is not to worry about it, to enjoy life, if you like a glass of wine have it". Hear hear.

Diana, The Sheep's Princess

Yesterday afternoon, I had the severe misfortune to catch some of the Concert For Diana on the BBC. It was basically full of fawning, servile 'celebrities' wanting a bit of publicity as they knew that thousands would be in attendance and millions watching on TV. They talked in what they hoped would be perceived as humble rapture about the woman who was killed by her own love-hate relationship with the press. Everyone seems to have forgotten that dead people did sometimes have failings when they were alive; Diana was a considerably capable manipulator of words and emotions, controlling her own destiny with crocodile tears in front of Martin Bashir, and always being certain to demonise the Royal Family as every hero needs a good villain. The hysteria of the people at that concert (who obviously have had nothing better to do with their whole lives for the last ten years) was only matched by the hysteria on the day of her funeral, when the entire country shut down for a day of self-glorified mourning. I went for a walk that day; the only good thing about it was that there was so little traffic on the roads that the country felt much more peaceful; I didn't feel depressed at all. These people who obsess about this decidedly average woman never seem to want to recognise the intelligent work that Prince Charles has performed for many charities, because they still hold a grudge that he had an affair in a marriage that he never wanted to be involved with in the first place! These people, are of course, sheep. They do not want to think outside what they have seen on the sensationalist television channels or read in the tabloid newspapers. That is why they love Diana so much: because the people's princess did so love being the shepherd.